<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cashing Out: Week of Nov 16-22nd, 2008 in Online Marketing News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/wpmaster/cashing-out-week-of-nov-16-22nd-2008-in-online-marketing-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/cashing-out/cashing-out-week-of-nov-16-22nd-2008-in-online-marketing-news/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Marketing, SEM, Social Media, Mobile and Video, Micro-Content, and Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel Djambazov</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/cashing-out/cashing-out-week-of-nov-16-22nd-2008-in-online-marketing-news/#comment-19550</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel Djambazov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/admin/cashing-out-week-of-nov-16-22nd-2008-in-online-marketing-news/#comment-19550</guid>
		<description>Hey Pat, 
 
Thanks for pointing out the link, it is fixed. The J.P. Morgan article is interesting and as you stated does reflect the &quot;fear&quot; factor in CPM rate adjustments that is the model traditional advertisers are most familiar with. ROAS is always important and those who don&#039;t bother to measure their return numbers closely will always get whacked. The pain points currently might be a little more sharp.  
 
Funny I always think of Pink Floyd when I think about advertising spend... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Pat,</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out the link, it is fixed. The J.P. Morgan article is interesting and as you stated does reflect the &quot;fear&quot; factor in CPM rate adjustments that is the model traditional advertisers are most familiar with. ROAS is always important and those who don&#039;t bother to measure their return numbers closely will always get whacked. The pain points currently might be a little more sharp. </p>
<p>Funny I always think of Pink Floyd when I think about advertising spend&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Grady</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/cashing-out/cashing-out-week-of-nov-16-22nd-2008-in-online-marketing-news/#comment-19549</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/admin/cashing-out-week-of-nov-16-22nd-2008-in-online-marketing-news/#comment-19549</guid>
		<description>On the CPM rate drop, I tried to follow your links and struck out.  In any case, I have this gaussian distribution assertion about the number of bidders at the outskirts of the mean pricing spread that has a lot to do with early slide rate implosion... a few high bidders on the skinny part of the bid amount population curve means rates in a high bid auction ecosystem (economy, not ecology) don&#039;t reflect the average very well at all, so there&#039;s what wall streeters call &#039;strong support&#039; behind those now-nervous bid leaders, and these secondary bidders are in much greater numbers.  Few stop bidding altogether, so the pop curve gets skinnier and taller.  So on a percentage basis, I think the present fear has driven CPM rates down the majority of their expected fall for a protracted bad economy.  At the support levels, are ROI minded folks who make money (not just a name for themselves) at these pocked up lower rates.  So who got whacked along the way?  Those that don&#039;t measure ad spend return or value well.  And who benefits?  Those who do measure themselves well - they have access to large media buys at prices that make sense to them.  Storm clouds look grey and somber on the bottom side, but from the top, it&#039;s...  well... a Johnny Nash kind of thang... 
 
I can see clearly now, the rain is gone, 
I can see all obstacles in my way 
Gone are the dark clouds that had me blind 
It&#8217;s gonna be a bright (bright), bright (bright) 
Sun-Shiny day. 
 
Anne Murray sang it too, though the Jimmy Cliff remake is the one I can hear in my inner thought ear right now... 
 
So get your metrics funk on, see clearly and it&#039;s all gonna be okay, maybe even a tad righteous. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the CPM rate drop, I tried to follow your links and struck out.  In any case, I have this gaussian distribution assertion about the number of bidders at the outskirts of the mean pricing spread that has a lot to do with early slide rate implosion&#8230; a few high bidders on the skinny part of the bid amount population curve means rates in a high bid auction ecosystem (economy, not ecology) don&#039;t reflect the average very well at all, so there&#039;s what wall streeters call &#039;strong support&#039; behind those now-nervous bid leaders, and these secondary bidders are in much greater numbers.  Few stop bidding altogether, so the pop curve gets skinnier and taller.  So on a percentage basis, I think the present fear has driven CPM rates down the majority of their expected fall for a protracted bad economy.  At the support levels, are ROI minded folks who make money (not just a name for themselves) at these pocked up lower rates.  So who got whacked along the way?  Those that don&#039;t measure ad spend return or value well.  And who benefits?  Those who do measure themselves well &#8211; they have access to large media buys at prices that make sense to them.  Storm clouds look grey and somber on the bottom side, but from the top, it&#039;s&#8230;  well&#8230; a Johnny Nash kind of thang&#8230;</p>
<p>I can see clearly now, the rain is gone,</p>
<p>I can see all obstacles in my way</p>
<p>Gone are the dark clouds that had me blind</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s gonna be a bright (bright), bright (bright)</p>
<p>Sun-Shiny day.</p>
<p>Anne Murray sang it too, though the Jimmy Cliff remake is the one I can hear in my inner thought ear right now&#8230;</p>
<p>So get your metrics funk on, see clearly and it&#039;s all gonna be okay, maybe even a tad righteous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.revenews.com @ 2012-02-09 17:11:07 -->
