<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google CPA Chatter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/toddcrawford/google-cpa-chatter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-marketing/google-cpa-chatter/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Marketing, SEM, Social Media, Mobile and Video, Micro-Content, and Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Carsten Cumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-marketing/google-cpa-chatter/#comment-8834</link>
		<dc:creator>Carsten Cumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=2152#comment-8834</guid>
		<description>Hi Todd, 
 
I made a number of (longer) posts to the subject over the past months that you might find interesting. They overlap with some of the stuff you are saying and also expand on that. 
 
June post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/worldwide-expansion-of-google-pay-per-action-cpa-beta/5153/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Worldwide Expansion of Google Pay-Per-Action (CPA) Beta&lt;/a&gt; 
 
August post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adwords-and-paid-search-cpa-vs-existing-cpc-model/5499/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google AdWords and Paid Search: CPA vs. Existing CPC-Model&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Cheers! 
Carsten </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Todd, </p>
<p>I made a number of (longer) posts to the subject over the past months that you might find interesting. They overlap with some of the stuff you are saying and also expand on that. </p>
<p>June post: <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/worldwide-expansion-of-google-pay-per-action-cpa-beta/5153/" rel="nofollow">Worldwide Expansion of Google Pay-Per-Action (CPA) Beta</a> </p>
<p>August post: <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adwords-and-paid-search-cpa-vs-existing-cpc-model/5499/" rel="nofollow">Google AdWords and Paid Search: CPA vs. Existing CPC-Model</a> </p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Carsten</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-marketing/google-cpa-chatter/#comment-8833</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=2152#comment-8833</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been part of the Google Pay Per Action Beta for several months now. Based on my experience I can confidently tell you: 
 
The affiliate industry has NOTHING to worry about. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been part of the Google Pay Per Action Beta for several months now. Based on my experience I can confidently tell you: </p>
<p>The affiliate industry has NOTHING to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade Crang</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-marketing/google-cpa-chatter/#comment-8832</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade Crang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=2152#comment-8832</guid>
		<description>Todd, 
 
I agree - for the most part (other than an eBay) 90% of Adv results come from a handful of their affiliates.  These top relationships need to be maintained and proactively optimized (i.e. coordinating marketing efforts).  Furthermore different affiliates (coupon sites, lead gen, search arb, etc...) need/want different type of interactions with the Adv whom they are promoting.  The optimal nurturing of these relationships is THE &quot;secret sauce&quot; behind success vs. failure. 
 
This &quot;secret sauce&quot; is what keeps start-up affiliate networks which offer lower fees and better features from getting an type market share from the likes of CJ. 
 
Can this &quot;secret sauce&quot; be acquired ???  Sure - Google can cut a check to Todd for $100M and it is theirs. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd, </p>
<p>I agree &#8211; for the most part (other than an eBay) 90% of Adv results come from a handful of their affiliates.  These top relationships need to be maintained and proactively optimized (i.e. coordinating marketing efforts).  Furthermore different affiliates (coupon sites, lead gen, search arb, etc&#8230;) need/want different type of interactions with the Adv whom they are promoting.  The optimal nurturing of these relationships is THE &quot;secret sauce&quot; behind success vs. failure. </p>
<p>This &quot;secret sauce&quot; is what keeps start-up affiliate networks which offer lower fees and better features from getting an type market share from the likes of CJ. </p>
<p>Can this &quot;secret sauce&quot; be acquired ???  Sure &#8211; Google can cut a check to Todd for $100M and it is theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-marketing/google-cpa-chatter/#comment-8831</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=2152#comment-8831</guid>
		<description>Another important thing here is that Google&#039;s code for affiliates (for now, at least) is all JavaScript. 
 
So you can&#039;t use it in e-mail, ppc, and other places. 
 
Plus, if you want to use a text link, you&#039;re going to be able to use what is available, and nothing else, because you can&#039;t edit what is displayed. 
 
An example of this is when an affiliate wants to earn referrals for recruiting new people to AdSense itself. 
 
These are the text link options: 
 
- Sign up for AdSense. 
- This site monetized by Google AdSense 
- Get targeted ads on your site with Google AdSense 
- Generate revenue from your website. Google AdSense. 
- This site recommends Google AdSense for targeted ads 
 
It&#039;s not an option to include a text link that simply reads &quot;Google AdSense&quot; within a review or other article where an affiliate might be able to recruit targeted prospects. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another important thing here is that Google&#039;s code for affiliates (for now, at least) is all JavaScript. </p>
<p>So you can&#039;t use it in e-mail, ppc, and other places. </p>
<p>Plus, if you want to use a text link, you&#039;re going to be able to use what is available, and nothing else, because you can&#039;t edit what is displayed. </p>
<p>An example of this is when an affiliate wants to earn referrals for recruiting new people to AdSense itself. </p>
<p>These are the text link options: </p>
<p>- Sign up for AdSense.<br />
- This site monetized by Google AdSense<br />
- Get targeted ads on your site with Google AdSense<br />
- Generate revenue from your website. Google AdSense.<br />
- This site recommends Google AdSense for targeted ads </p>
<p>It&#039;s not an option to include a text link that simply reads &quot;Google AdSense&quot; within a review or other article where an affiliate might be able to recruit targeted prospects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.revenews.com @ 2012-02-09 00:10:01 -->
