<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ve been told I should blog more&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/timstorm/ive-been-told-i-should-blog-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/ive-been-told-i-should-blog-more/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Marketing, SEM, Social Media, Mobile and Video, Micro-Content, and Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Booth</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/ive-been-told-i-should-blog-more/#comment-8761</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=2137#comment-8761</guid>
		<description>Ahhh sorry Tim I misunderstood.  Yes that makes sense.

The AM should facilitate the contact with the Direct Mail people only if needed, not be pushed as the middle man/woman in the communication chain.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh sorry Tim I misunderstood.  Yes that makes sense.</p>
<p>The AM should facilitate the contact with the Direct Mail people only if needed, not be pushed as the middle man/woman in the communication chain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Storm</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/ive-been-told-i-should-blog-more/#comment-8760</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=2137#comment-8760</guid>
		<description>To clarify.... If the problem is with a direct mail piece... don&#039;t have the affiliate manager  &quot;get in the way&quot;, have the direct mail people give us a call.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify&#8230;. If the problem is with a direct mail piece&#8230; don&#039;t have the affiliate manager  &quot;get in the way&quot;, have the direct mail people give us a call&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Booth</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/ive-been-told-i-should-blog-more/#comment-8758</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=2137#comment-8758</guid>
		<description>Tim, I don&#039;t really have a forum so I don&#039;t particularly have much insight into this area but would it be safe to assume even though you are not getting a direct affiliate commission you are getting added traffic/eyeballs?  Wouldn&#039;t this translate into leveraging the merchants brand (and coupon) to gain said traffic and even though again there is no direct click to a affiliate link you in essence are banking on the conitued traffic of that consumer to make a purchase that is trackable?  Also, you can leverage all those eyeballs into your Advertising Kit and charge more for adverts.  Either way you probably make just a little more by allowing users to post those forbidden coupons.  I would to if I had a nice forum like yours! heh heh heh

oh and isn&#039;t that part of the AM job to manage us?  Maybe I do not understand, do you want someone else to contact you about an issue?

Thanks for the insight.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, I don&#8217;t really have a forum so I don&#8217;t particularly have much insight into this area but would it be safe to assume even though you are not getting a direct affiliate commission you are getting added traffic/eyeballs?  Wouldn&#8217;t this translate into leveraging the merchants brand (and coupon) to gain said traffic and even though again there is no direct click to a affiliate link you in essence are banking on the conitued traffic of that consumer to make a purchase that is trackable?  Also, you can leverage all those eyeballs into your Advertising Kit and charge more for adverts.  Either way you probably make just a little more by allowing users to post those forbidden coupons.  I would to if I had a nice forum like yours! heh heh heh</p>
<p>oh and isn&#8217;t that part of the AM job to manage us?  Maybe I do not understand, do you want someone else to contact you about an issue?</p>
<p>Thanks for the insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molander</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/ive-been-told-i-should-blog-more/#comment-8759</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=2137#comment-8759</guid>
		<description>Because it&#039;s easier than practicing multi-channel marketing? 
 
I think that&#039;s part of the answer.  I also believe that affiliate marketing is viewed as a &quot;lesser&quot; form of online marketing; hence, it gets treated this way.  What you describe, Tim, is almost like parental type of relationship.  What ever happened to those &quot;child leashes&quot; we used to see so many of?  Perhaps we need to bring them back... or affiliate networks need a parental control type device; say, to lock affiliates out of trademark bidding almost like parents block the Spice channel from their children. 
 
(setting up David Lewis; paging David Lewis... come in David... how are you reading me?) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it&#039;s easier than practicing multi-channel marketing? </p>
<p>I think that&#039;s part of the answer.  I also believe that affiliate marketing is viewed as a &quot;lesser&quot; form of online marketing; hence, it gets treated this way.  What you describe, Tim, is almost like parental type of relationship.  What ever happened to those &quot;child leashes&quot; we used to see so many of?  Perhaps we need to bring them back&#8230; or affiliate networks need a parental control type device; say, to lock affiliates out of trademark bidding almost like parents block the Spice channel from their children. </p>
<p>(setting up David Lewis; paging David Lewis&#8230; come in David&#8230; how are you reading me?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/ive-been-told-i-should-blog-more/#comment-8757</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=2137#comment-8757</guid>
		<description>Sometimes random thoughts are the most insightful. Can&#039;t wait to hear more of them from you Tim! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes random thoughts are the most insightful. Can&#039;t wait to hear more of them from you Tim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.revenews.com @ 2012-02-09 06:08:14 -->
