<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Unlabeled Affiliate Links Be Banned From Google, Mahalo, etc?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Advertising, CPA, SEO, Affiliate and Next Generation Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:55:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mahalo Enhances Business Model With Affiliate Links &#124; CenterNetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-23868</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahalo Enhances Business Model With Affiliate Links &#124; CenterNetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/#comment-23868</guid>
		<description>[...] has been made about Jason&#8217;s presentation at the affiliate summit last month. So it&#8217;s interesting that the business model update is around affiliates and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been made about Jason&#8217;s presentation at the affiliate summit last month. So it&#8217;s interesting that the business model update is around affiliates and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Barnhart</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-21545</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Barnhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 13:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/#comment-21545</guid>
		<description>Excluding twitter for the moment, why not use an existing paradigm to deal with affiliate links - semantically as microformats?. Something as simple as rel=&quot;affiliate&quot; might be sufficient. A more complex microformat might identify the advertiser or network (a la rel=&quot;license&quot; microformat”).

This way, the small percentage of people who may be concerned can download the inevitable plugin if needed, management and links to privacy and disclosure pages automated, etc. Of course, the real drivers of this may need to the actual affiliate programs - if CJ for example put this in their auto code generation tool.

As for Twitter, the major URL shorteners like BudURL could simply set up a complementary domain for affiliate/sponsored links and maintain the disclosure on their site via a link preview function. Again, it would help if Twitter then autotagged the URL.

A modest proposal, at least. And requires no one else’s permission to start!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excluding twitter for the moment, why not use an existing paradigm to deal with affiliate links &#8211; semantically as microformats?. Something as simple as rel=&#8221;affiliate&#8221; might be sufficient. A more complex microformat might identify the advertiser or network (a la rel=&#8221;license&#8221; microformat”).</p>
<p>This way, the small percentage of people who may be concerned can download the inevitable plugin if needed, management and links to privacy and disclosure pages automated, etc. Of course, the real drivers of this may need to the actual affiliate programs &#8211; if CJ for example put this in their auto code generation tool.</p>
<p>As for Twitter, the major URL shorteners like BudURL could simply set up a complementary domain for affiliate/sponsored links and maintain the disclosure on their site via a link preview function. Again, it would help if Twitter then autotagged the URL.</p>
<p>A modest proposal, at least. And requires no one else’s permission to start!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahalo Enhances Business Model With Affiliate Links &#160;&#187;TechAddress</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-11704</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahalo Enhances Business Model With Affiliate Links &#160;&#187;TechAddress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/#comment-11704</guid>
		<description>[...] has been made about Jason&#8217;s presentation at the affiliate summit last month. So it&#8217;s interesting that the business model update is around affiliates and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been made about Jason&#8217;s presentation at the affiliate summit last month. So it&#8217;s interesting that the business model update is around affiliates and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-11066</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/#comment-11066</guid>
		<description>“Google has banned paid links, do you think they should follow Mahalo and ban/lower the ranking of pages with undisclosed affiliate links?”

Mahalo should do something to be unique. They are not Google. Start with User Experience. White list those that are good- block the rest. Add community and a new way of feedback- it has to be earth shattering new.

Not tools to fill up &quot;social media&quot; sites- given them tools too pollute? Here fill up RSS aggregators all at once...nice User Experience...

WEB IS NOT RSS...

Affiliates (or black hats)- some of you have behaved like Jason. Relative... don&#039;t worry about him...karmic debt. What can you do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Google has banned paid links, do you think they should follow Mahalo and ban/lower the ranking of pages with undisclosed affiliate links?”</p>
<p>Mahalo should do something to be unique. They are not Google. Start with User Experience. White list those that are good- block the rest. Add community and a new way of feedback- it has to be earth shattering new.</p>
<p>Not tools to fill up &#8220;social media&#8221; sites- given them tools too pollute? Here fill up RSS aggregators all at once&#8230;nice User Experience&#8230;</p>
<p>WEB IS NOT RSS&#8230;</p>
<p>Affiliates (or black hats)- some of you have behaved like Jason. Relative&#8230; don&#8217;t worry about him&#8230;karmic debt. What can you do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-11039</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/#comment-11039</guid>
		<description>Jason has completed his task...as was expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason has completed his task&#8230;as was expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-11038</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/#comment-11038</guid>
		<description>I laugh everytime I read this line,

&quot;Google has banned paid links, do you think they should follow Mahalo and ban/lower the ranking of pages with undisclosed affiliate links?&quot;

Ya, Google will follow Mahalo, lol. 

Here&#039;s my opinion, who cares? 

We are really giving a sub standard &quot;directory&quot; to much coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I laugh everytime I read this line,</p>
<p>&#8220;Google has banned paid links, do you think they should follow Mahalo and ban/lower the ranking of pages with undisclosed affiliate links?&#8221;</p>
<p>Ya, Google will follow Mahalo, lol. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my opinion, who cares? </p>
<p>We are really giving a sub standard &#8220;directory&#8221; to much coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Grady</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-11036</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/#comment-11036</guid>
		<description>G hasn&#039;t even really banned paid links or every site in the paid Yahoo Directory would have disappeared from the serps.

Regarding labeling, G&#039;s take is more... don&#039;t be deceptive with your visitors.  Far different than requiring complete disclosure of all of the details behind the scenes concerning why you&#039;ve built / provided what you have.

Does G itself explain repeatedly and loudly and locally to consumers, on each upload or visit to YouTube, that they&#039;ve wanted people to upload their videos so they can build an audience and also use that same media for monetization at a future date?

With each search, does G explain (local to that search with a label) that their cookie is recording information used for behavioral targeting?

Labeling ideas runeth amuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G hasn&#8217;t even really banned paid links or every site in the paid Yahoo Directory would have disappeared from the serps.</p>
<p>Regarding labeling, G&#8217;s take is more&#8230; don&#8217;t be deceptive with your visitors.  Far different than requiring complete disclosure of all of the details behind the scenes concerning why you&#8217;ve built / provided what you have.</p>
<p>Does G itself explain repeatedly and loudly and locally to consumers, on each upload or visit to YouTube, that they&#8217;ve wanted people to upload their videos so they can build an audience and also use that same media for monetization at a future date?</p>
<p>With each search, does G explain (local to that search with a label) that their cookie is recording information used for behavioral targeting?</p>
<p>Labeling ideas runeth amuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-11015</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/#comment-11015</guid>
		<description>Sam- Remember our talks on Sokal? (and my jokes on Liber 777)

I think labels do matter...and perhaps labeling is ok, but without context, the label may not be accurate...I do understand what you are saying now. It is all relative.

-wayne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam- Remember our talks on Sokal? (and my jokes on Liber 777)</p>
<p>I think labels do matter&#8230;and perhaps labeling is ok, but without context, the label may not be accurate&#8230;I do understand what you are saying now. It is all relative.</p>
<p>-wayne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-11014</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/#comment-11014</guid>
		<description>What if say, I have a private label turn-key site...do you ban this?

Let us say- the terrain is not flat- it is 3D- where do you disclose?

Has anyone studied the changes of disclosure against non-disclosure?

Do most have any clue what an affiliate link is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if say, I have a private label turn-key site&#8230;do you ban this?</p>
<p>Let us say- the terrain is not flat- it is 3D- where do you disclose?</p>
<p>Has anyone studied the changes of disclosure against non-disclosure?</p>
<p>Do most have any clue what an affiliate link is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan (Trust)</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-11005</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan (Trust)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/samharrelson/should-unlabeled-affiliate-links-be-banned-from-google-mahalo-etc/#comment-11005</guid>
		<description>With his thinking, maybe Mahalo should ban the site he&#039;s on the board of?  Since I don&#039;t see those affiliate links labeled.  I see Buy at: list of links and some are unlabeled affiliate links.  Also might want to read over the Adsense terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With his thinking, maybe Mahalo should ban the site he&#8217;s on the board of?  Since I don&#8217;t see those affiliate links labeled.  I see Buy at: list of links and some are unlabeled affiliate links.  Also might want to read over the Adsense terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
