<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC Investigating Google&#8217;s DoubleClick Plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/mikeallen/ftc-investigating-googles-doubleclick-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-marketing/ftc-investigating-googles-doubleclick-plans/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Marketing, SEM, Social Media, Mobile and Video, Micro-Content, and Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Figueredo</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-marketing/ftc-investigating-googles-doubleclick-plans/#comment-8007</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Figueredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=1766#comment-8007</guid>
		<description>Looks like the FTC investigation is just a formality and their main concern is how much data Google now has access to rather than any monopolistic issue. Sounds like this deal is 99% likely to get approved based on this article in businessweek.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2007/tc20070529_360181.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2007/tc20070529_360181.htm&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the FTC investigation is just a formality and their main concern is how much data Google now has access to rather than any monopolistic issue. Sounds like this deal is 99% likely to get approved based on this article in businessweek.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2007/tc20070529_360181.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2007/tc20070529_360181.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-marketing/ftc-investigating-googles-doubleclick-plans/#comment-8006</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=1766#comment-8006</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Sandra.  When Google started censoring search results in China at the communist government&#039;s &quot;request&quot; while refusing U.S. government requests for aggregate keyword data to understand terrorists, I feel they, as a company, lost their soul. I&#039;m usually not a fan of government intervention; however in this case I&#039;d like to see a little more investigation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Sandra.  When Google started censoring search results in China at the communist government&#8217;s &#8220;request&#8221; while refusing U.S. government requests for aggregate keyword data to understand terrorists, I feel they, as a company, lost their soul. I&#8217;m usually not a fan of government intervention; however in this case I&#8217;d like to see a little more investigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.revenews.com @ 2012-02-09 14:15:50 -->
