<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Litmus Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/jimmydaniels/the-google-litmus-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/jimmydaniels/the-google-litmus-test/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Advertising, CPA, SEO, Affiliate and Next Generation Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:53:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/jimmydaniels/the-google-litmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-11842</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/jimmydaniels/the-google-litmus-test/#comment-11842</guid>
		<description>Well, at least others are checking out some of the Mahalo spam, er content, as well, http://www.seobook.com/official-mahalo-com-spam-according-googles-internal-spam-documents and http://blog.derekville.net/2008/03/21/jason-calacanis-and-his-human-powered-spam/ Jason is trying his best to difuse it by asking them how to make those pages better, etc, but, no matter what he does it will still be a site just like the ones he said was cluttering up the search engines, he even says that over time it will grow to be 50% original content. IF he paid people who were experts in their fields to write stuff for them, that might be a different story, but that would cost them too much money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least others are checking out some of the Mahalo spam, er content, as well, <a href="http://www.seobook.com/official-mahalo-com-spam-according-googles-internal-spam-documents" rel="nofollow">http://www.seobook.com/official-mahalo-com-spam-according-googles-internal-spam-documents</a> and <a href="http://blog.derekville.net/2008/03/21/jason-calacanis-and-his-human-powered-spam/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.derekville.net/2008/03/21/jason-calacanis-and-his-human-powered-spam/</a> Jason is trying his best to difuse it by asking them how to make those pages better, etc, but, no matter what he does it will still be a site just like the ones he said was cluttering up the search engines, he even says that over time it will grow to be 50% original content. IF he paid people who were experts in their fields to write stuff for them, that might be a different story, but that would cost them too much money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jangro</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/jimmydaniels/the-google-litmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-11522</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jangro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/jimmydaniels/the-google-litmus-test/#comment-11522</guid>
		<description>Jimmy, great post.  

It&#039;s as if you read my mind.  I was having this exact conversation with someone yesterday morning.

I&#039;ve been observing the same thing about Mahalo&#039;s stub pages, how they seem to front-load them from big keyword lists for SEO purposes.  There are about 10,000 in Google right now, many rank very well, and they&#039;ve got very little content on them.  But they do seem to have *some* content which may be saving them.

Or perhaps they&#039;re just big enough to be exempt from being considered pollution with these stub pages. 

If it were me, I&#039;d be concerned and would definitely have noindex/nofollow on them.  But I&#039;m not JC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy, great post.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s as if you read my mind.  I was having this exact conversation with someone yesterday morning.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been observing the same thing about Mahalo&#8217;s stub pages, how they seem to front-load them from big keyword lists for SEO purposes.  There are about 10,000 in Google right now, many rank very well, and they&#8217;ve got very little content on them.  But they do seem to have *some* content which may be saving them.</p>
<p>Or perhaps they&#8217;re just big enough to be exempt from being considered pollution with these stub pages. </p>
<p>If it were me, I&#8217;d be concerned and would definitely have noindex/nofollow on them.  But I&#8217;m not JC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
