<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google Out to Put an End to Affiliate Marketing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/connieberg/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Marketing, SEM, Social Media, Mobile and Video, Micro-Content, and Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/#comment-3773</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=778#comment-3773</guid>
		<description>Hello ... I am a product manager at Google and we released support for third party conversion tracking yesterday.  I&#039;d love to hear any feedback once you&#039;ve had a chance to tinker with it. 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/apis/checkout/developer/checkout_pixel_tracking.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://code.google.com/apis/checkout/developer/ch...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello &#8230; I am a product manager at Google and we released support for third party conversion tracking yesterday.  I&#039;d love to hear any feedback once you&#039;ve had a chance to tinker with it. </p>
<p><a href="http://code.google.com/apis/checkout/developer/checkout_pixel_tracking.html" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/apis/checkout/developer/ch&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Buquet</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/#comment-3772</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Buquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 12:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=778#comment-3772</guid>
		<description>UPDATE: Ahhhhh the power of the blogosphere! Matt Cutts from Google just let me know over at ThreadWatch that he jumped in to help as soon as he heard. Matt wrote: 
 
&quot;Linda, as soon as I heard people saying that there were tracking issues, I escalated it to the Google Checkout folks. I know they&#039;re looking to see if there&#039;s anything they can do pretty quickly to help on this issue.&quot; 
 
I of course, asked him if the cute cartoon of him pushing Checkout that I used in my 2nd blog, helped get his attention! LOL Thanks Matt you are awesome! 
 
Here&#039;s the ThreadWatch thread if anyone wants to catch up on the conversation over there. 
 
Google Undermining Paypal in Their War on Affiliates 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.threadwatch.org/node/10494&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.threadwatch.org/node/10494&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.threadwatch.org/node/10494&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: Ahhhhh the power of the blogosphere! Matt Cutts from Google just let me know over at ThreadWatch that he jumped in to help as soon as he heard. Matt wrote: </p>
<p>&quot;Linda, as soon as I heard people saying that there were tracking issues, I escalated it to the Google Checkout folks. I know they&#039;re looking to see if there&#039;s anything they can do pretty quickly to help on this issue.&quot; </p>
<p>I of course, asked him if the cute cartoon of him pushing Checkout that I used in my 2nd blog, helped get his attention! LOL Thanks Matt you are awesome! </p>
<p>Here&#039;s the ThreadWatch thread if anyone wants to catch up on the conversation over there. </p>
<p>Google Undermining Paypal in Their War on Affiliates<br />
<a href="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/10494" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/10494" rel="nofollow">http://www.threadwatch.org/node/10494</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Lohse</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/#comment-3771</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Lohse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=778#comment-3771</guid>
		<description>Adam, if what you are reporting is true, for those CJ merchants who are not willing or unable to credit affiliate sales made through Google checkout, then I&#039;d say it is more than grossly inappropriate on Google&#039;s part - it sounds illegal. 
 
I am not sure why any affiliate (savvy or not) would choose to actively promote a merchant on a pay per sale basis if that merchant actively diverts a significant portion of the traffic you send to non-payable channels. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, if what you are reporting is true, for those CJ merchants who are not willing or unable to credit affiliate sales made through Google checkout, then I&#039;d say it is more than grossly inappropriate on Google&#039;s part &#8211; it sounds illegal. </p>
<p>I am not sure why any affiliate (savvy or not) would choose to actively promote a merchant on a pay per sale basis if that merchant actively diverts a significant portion of the traffic you send to non-payable channels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Viener</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/#comment-3770</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Viener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 08:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=778#comment-3770</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Would the savvy affiliate drop merchants that used Google Checkout&quot;&lt;/i&gt; 
 
Well I can tell you from a paid search perspective, we might have to.  If we are sending traffic and more and more of that traffic goes through Google checkout and we don&#039;t get paid for that traffic, then our ROI&#039;s will fall, our max bid prices will fall, and eventually the merchant just won&#039;t be profitable to promote anymore. 
 
My gut feeling tells me it&#039;s more of a merchant configuration issue with Google checkout than an affiliate network issue, I am sure Google provides a way to pass pixel tracking on the checkout landing pages.  My contact at Performics indicated that this is in fact the case. 
 
I guess I am a little more concerned with Google arbitrarily putting the Google checkout logos on our ads for merchants who support Google checkout.  If they are using our dollars to promote a checkout path that we don&#039;t get compensated for, that is grossly inappropriate. 
 
Adam </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&quot;Would the savvy affiliate drop merchants that used Google Checkout&quot;</i> </p>
<p>Well I can tell you from a paid search perspective, we might have to.  If we are sending traffic and more and more of that traffic goes through Google checkout and we don&#039;t get paid for that traffic, then our ROI&#039;s will fall, our max bid prices will fall, and eventually the merchant just won&#039;t be profitable to promote anymore. </p>
<p>My gut feeling tells me it&#039;s more of a merchant configuration issue with Google checkout than an affiliate network issue, I am sure Google provides a way to pass pixel tracking on the checkout landing pages.  My contact at Performics indicated that this is in fact the case. </p>
<p>I guess I am a little more concerned with Google arbitrarily putting the Google checkout logos on our ads for merchants who support Google checkout.  If they are using our dollars to promote a checkout path that we don&#039;t get compensated for, that is grossly inappropriate. </p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Hamrick</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/#comment-3769</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Hamrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 21:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=778#comment-3769</guid>
		<description>I have to believe that Google is not adversarial to affiliates but then again both LinkShare and Commission Junction have made decisions that grossly impacted the affiliate body. It would be a pity of Google further burned a whole in the affiliate channel. Its bad enough that affiliates fight parasites, chargebacks, late payments, lousy accounting. It begs the question, would the savvy affiliate drop merchants that used Google Checkout?? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to believe that Google is not adversarial to affiliates but then again both LinkShare and Commission Junction have made decisions that grossly impacted the affiliate body. It would be a pity of Google further burned a whole in the affiliate channel. Its bad enough that affiliates fight parasites, chargebacks, late payments, lousy accounting. It begs the question, would the savvy affiliate drop merchants that used Google Checkout??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artie meehan</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/#comment-3768</link>
		<dc:creator>artie meehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=778#comment-3768</guid>
		<description>Is there really any fairness in any business other than survival of the fittest??? Artie </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there really any fairness in any business other than survival of the fittest??? Artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Viener</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/#comment-3767</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Viener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 08:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=778#comment-3767</guid>
		<description>If this is true that Google Checkout orders are not tracked by the affilaite networks, then Google is adding insult to injury to some search affilaites, I have seen some of my ads for merchants that I promote directly in search start to automatically show up with the Google Checkout symbol on my ads!!! 
 
Did I authorize it, no.  If it creates better click through rates, then great, if I don&#039;t get paid when they checkout, then yuck!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is true that Google Checkout orders are not tracked by the affilaite networks, then Google is adding insult to injury to some search affilaites, I have seen some of my ads for merchants that I promote directly in search start to automatically show up with the Google Checkout symbol on my ads!!! </p>
<p>Did I authorize it, no.  If it creates better click through rates, then great, if I don&#039;t get paid when they checkout, then yuck!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Buquet</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/#comment-3766</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Buquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 13:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=778#comment-3766</guid>
		<description>Merry Christmas Affiliates, from Google 
 
Aside from the issue of special merchant coupons for Checkout - Checkout is a still a major affiliate leak all around as I see it.  I don&#039;t necessarily trust all merchants to upload separate transactions that aren&#039;t automatically tracked.  Especially this time of year when it&#039;s so busy.  I know merchants who PROMISE to pay 800# commission and don&#039;t, simply because they are short staffed and the order entry people just never get around to entering the manual transactions. 
 
(They were not purposely trying to screw affiliates - it simply was not enough of a priority for the already buried staff to do the extra work. If I screamed loud enough and long enough and threatened to OUT them some phone transactions would get entered for awhile, then fade away again. I stopped managing the program - largely for this reason.) 
 
This is a big reason why I don&#039;t trust anything that has to be done manually after the fact.  I&#039;m sure many merchants are automated to the point that they don&#039;t even need to have staff involvement, but we all know lots of smaller merchants, that aren&#039;t very tech savvy and that are short staffed and busy. Who&#039;s to guarantee all these Checkout orders get processed and uploaded correctly? 
 
For there to be NO leaks the process MUST be automated IMHO. Checkout does let merchants use &quot;web beacons&quot;, could this be a possible solution? I can only find info that&#039;s written for the consumer to let them know their transaction can be tracked by the merchant.  (It also tells consumers to just DELETE their cookies if they don&#039;t want the referral source to be tracked.) :-( 
 
Google Checkout: Buyer Help Center - 
What does it mean if a seller tracks advertising campaign performance? 
 
&quot;What does it mean if a seller tracks advertising campaign performance? 
 
&quot;Google Checkout allows stores to track conversions from advertising by adding a web beacon to the Google Checkout order confirmation page. A web beacon is an electronic image (1x1 .gif) within a web page that helps a seller analyze customer traffic, and track transactions.&quot; 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://checkout.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=43192&amp;query=affiliate&amp;topic=0&amp;type=f&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://checkout.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
OR if the Google web beacon can&#039;t be used possibly Google would allow merchants to place a CJ tracking pixel instead??? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merry Christmas Affiliates, from Google </p>
<p>Aside from the issue of special merchant coupons for Checkout &#8211; Checkout is a still a major affiliate leak all around as I see it.  I don&#039;t necessarily trust all merchants to upload separate transactions that aren&#039;t automatically tracked.  Especially this time of year when it&#039;s so busy.  I know merchants who PROMISE to pay 800# commission and don&#039;t, simply because they are short staffed and the order entry people just never get around to entering the manual transactions. </p>
<p>(They were not purposely trying to screw affiliates &#8211; it simply was not enough of a priority for the already buried staff to do the extra work. If I screamed loud enough and long enough and threatened to OUT them some phone transactions would get entered for awhile, then fade away again. I stopped managing the program &#8211; largely for this reason.) </p>
<p>This is a big reason why I don&#039;t trust anything that has to be done manually after the fact.  I&#039;m sure many merchants are automated to the point that they don&#039;t even need to have staff involvement, but we all know lots of smaller merchants, that aren&#039;t very tech savvy and that are short staffed and busy. Who&#039;s to guarantee all these Checkout orders get processed and uploaded correctly? </p>
<p>For there to be NO leaks the process MUST be automated IMHO. Checkout does let merchants use &quot;web beacons&quot;, could this be a possible solution? I can only find info that&#039;s written for the consumer to let them know their transaction can be tracked by the merchant.  (It also tells consumers to just DELETE their cookies if they don&#039;t want the referral source to be tracked.) <img src='http://www.revenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Google Checkout: Buyer Help Center &#8211;<br />
What does it mean if a seller tracks advertising campaign performance? </p>
<p>&quot;What does it mean if a seller tracks advertising campaign performance? </p>
<p>&quot;Google Checkout allows stores to track conversions from advertising by adding a web beacon to the Google Checkout order confirmation page. A web beacon is an electronic image (1&#215;1 .gif) within a web page that helps a seller analyze customer traffic, and track transactions.&quot; </p>
<p><a href="http://checkout.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=43192&amp;query=affiliate&amp;topic=0&amp;type=f" rel="nofollow">http://checkout.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>OR if the Google web beacon can&#039;t be used possibly Google would allow merchants to place a CJ tracking pixel instead???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molander</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/#comment-3765</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 11:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=778#comment-3765</guid>
		<description>Nope.  Google wants to do what Jeff Pullen is out to do and what companies like J.L. Halsey are up to. 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.btobonline.com/article.cms?articleId=29478&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.btobonline.com/article.cms?articleId=2...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.  Google wants to do what Jeff Pullen is out to do and what companies like J.L. Halsey are up to. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.btobonline.com/article.cms?articleId=29478" rel="nofollow">http://www.btobonline.com/article.cms?articleId=2&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kukral</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/is-google-out-to-put-an-end-to-affiliate-marketing/#comment-3763</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kukral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 05:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=778#comment-3763</guid>
		<description>Connie may not blog much anymore, but she still knows how to hit the magic button. Tagged to subscribe to comments.

I&#039;ll ask you this question Connie.

What does fairness have to do with big business and billions of dollars?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connie may not blog much anymore, but she still knows how to hit the magic button. Tagged to subscribe to comments.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll ask you this question Connie.</p>
<p>What does fairness have to do with big business and billions of dollars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.revenews.com @ 2012-02-09 16:12:48 -->
