<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality Not Neutered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/bradwaller/net-neutrality-not-neutered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/civic-responsibility/net-neutrality-not-neutered/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Marketing, SEM, Social Media, Mobile and Video, Micro-Content, and Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Carsten Cumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/civic-responsibility/net-neutrality-not-neutered/#comment-19660</link>
		<dc:creator>Carsten Cumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 01:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/bradwaller/net-neutrality-not-neutered/#comment-19660</guid>
		<description>Great post and excellent research Brad.  
 
It is simple as this: 
 
If you give control over who can when access which information or if certain information are accessible at all, into the hands of an non-democratic entity (e.g. corporation where majority votes by employees don&#039;t mean anything last time I checked), guess what you get ... 
 
So unless you want to eliminate the real freedom that the Internet made possible, you better be for Net Neutrality.  
 
To get an idea how it looks like, if you got it all wrong, just look at Copyright and traditional media today. Copyright restricts creativity and is often used (not intentionally necessarily, but as a side effect) to control distribution and availability of content and information.  
 
That&#039;s literally censorship and if control is consolidated far enough, then you can do really funny things, such as rewriting history and oppress people, by using partial truth and manipulated images to sell convenient lies to them. 
 
Okay, social media turns this brave new world up site down and the majority of the population into criminals, but this whole mess is not sorted out yet. ... well, different subject, but somewhat related :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and excellent research Brad. </p>
<p>It is simple as this:</p>
<p>If you give control over who can when access which information or if certain information are accessible at all, into the hands of an non-democratic entity (e.g. corporation where majority votes by employees don&#039;t mean anything last time I checked), guess what you get &#8230;</p>
<p>So unless you want to eliminate the real freedom that the Internet made possible, you better be for Net Neutrality. </p>
<p>To get an idea how it looks like, if you got it all wrong, just look at Copyright and traditional media today. Copyright restricts creativity and is often used (not intentionally necessarily, but as a side effect) to control distribution and availability of content and information. </p>
<p>That&#039;s literally censorship and if control is consolidated far enough, then you can do really funny things, such as rewriting history and oppress people, by using partial truth and manipulated images to sell convenient lies to them.</p>
<p>Okay, social media turns this brave new world up site down and the majority of the population into criminals, but this whole mess is not sorted out yet. &#8230; well, different subject, but somewhat related <img src='http://www.revenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eBranchOffice.com</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/civic-responsibility/net-neutrality-not-neutered/#comment-19658</link>
		<dc:creator>eBranchOffice.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 00:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/bradwaller/net-neutrality-not-neutered/#comment-19658</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this.  The monopoly media companies want to maintain a situation like television where they control what channels can be seen.  An open digital world is really cramping their monopoly preferences. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this.  The monopoly media companies want to maintain a situation like television where they control what channels can be seen.  An open digital world is really cramping their monopoly preferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.revenews.com @ 2012-02-09 05:30:43 -->
