<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deep Packet Injection = Trademark Infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/bradwaller/deep-packet-injection-trademark-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-publishing/deep-packet-injection-trademark-infringement/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Marketing, SEM, Social Media, Mobile and Video, Micro-Content, and Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: pup</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-publishing/deep-packet-injection-trademark-infringement/#comment-18139</link>
		<dc:creator>pup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/bradwaller/deep-packet-injection-trademark-infringement/#comment-18139</guid>
		<description>the AntiPhorm end users activist group have been saying this for a very long time now, in effect, we cant make it any clearer than this... to the average person.

plain and simple,its &quot;commercial piracy&quot; for profit.

 these ISPs dont own the unique datastream,they dont have a licence from the owner of that data (thats YOU the end user and the website owner), they dont have a licence to make a derivative work from that data, they are infact commercial pirates stealing YOUR unique datastream, and that (to repeat it) is a criminal offence in most developed countrys, plain and simple.


any executive person (not just the company that employs him/her) that authorises or rubber stamps such unlawful wiretapping is infact liable to criminal (not mearly civil) Prosecution that carrys real jail time and fines in bothe the UK, the EU and the US at least, thats something very serious to let your executive board know and readally understand you might think...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the AntiPhorm end users activist group have been saying this for a very long time now, in effect, we cant make it any clearer than this&#8230; to the average person.</p>
<p>plain and simple,its &#8220;commercial piracy&#8221; for profit.</p>
<p> these ISPs dont own the unique datastream,they dont have a licence from the owner of that data (thats YOU the end user and the website owner), they dont have a licence to make a derivative work from that data, they are infact commercial pirates stealing YOUR unique datastream, and that (to repeat it) is a criminal offence in most developed countrys, plain and simple.</p>
<p>any executive person (not just the company that employs him/her) that authorises or rubber stamps such unlawful wiretapping is infact liable to criminal (not mearly civil) Prosecution that carrys real jail time and fines in bothe the UK, the EU and the US at least, thats something very serious to let your executive board know and readally understand you might think&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Individual</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-publishing/deep-packet-injection-trademark-infringement/#comment-18129</link>
		<dc:creator>Private Individual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/bradwaller/deep-packet-injection-trademark-infringement/#comment-18129</guid>
		<description>There are already encryption solutions available to overcome this illicit snooping, but the question is do we really want a closed &quot;dark&quot; Internet, just because of the greed of some Companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are already encryption solutions available to overcome this illicit snooping, but the question is do we really want a closed &#8220;dark&#8221; Internet, just because of the greed of some Companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Grady</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/online-publishing/deep-packet-injection-trademark-infringement/#comment-17412</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/bradwaller/deep-packet-injection-trademark-infringement/#comment-17412</guid>
		<description>More money grubbing intrusionary tactics from any party that can manage to touch our datastreams. 
 
The solution to all of this is a long way off, but it IS these events today, that will shape the privacy policies implemented by governments of tomorrow. 
 
In that regard, I&#039;m happy to see it happening. 
 
I predict that some foreign company, from a country on everyone&#039;s mental suspicions lists, will eventually be the tipping point in all of this.  When some rogue nation cuts a deal with an ISP (or creates a BHO, or a PC maker, or...) to do things similar to NebuAd (I don&#039;t mean ads, I mean having access to monitor datastream packets and finding clever ways to nearly-invisibly monetize that information), people will finally realize the scope of what has been evolving, and how dangerous it is to the robustness and future growth of our digital economy. 
 
I also predict there will be a commercial connectivity application in the future, that will randomly segment an individual&#039;s packets and somehow distribute their routing and pathways through multiple gateways and ISPs, as preventative medicine for a subscribed consumer&#039;s packet privacy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More money grubbing intrusionary tactics from any party that can manage to touch our datastreams.</p>
<p>The solution to all of this is a long way off, but it IS these events today, that will shape the privacy policies implemented by governments of tomorrow.</p>
<p>In that regard, I&#039;m happy to see it happening.</p>
<p>I predict that some foreign company, from a country on everyone&#039;s mental suspicions lists, will eventually be the tipping point in all of this.  When some rogue nation cuts a deal with an ISP (or creates a BHO, or a PC maker, or&#8230;) to do things similar to NebuAd (I don&#039;t mean ads, I mean having access to monitor datastream packets and finding clever ways to nearly-invisibly monetize that information), people will finally realize the scope of what has been evolving, and how dangerous it is to the robustness and future growth of our digital economy.</p>
<p>I also predict there will be a commercial connectivity application in the future, that will randomly segment an individual&#039;s packets and somehow distribute their routing and pathways through multiple gateways and ISPs, as preventative medicine for a subscribed consumer&#039;s packet privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.revenews.com @ 2012-02-09 14:45:25 -->
