<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The FTC, Affiliate Marketing, and Chicken Little</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/bethkirsch/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Marketing, SEM, Social Media, Mobile and Video, Micro-Content, and Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Shubitz</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Shubitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=255#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>Of course the sky is not falling and the Affiliate channell and everyone else involved will continue to work. However, I respectfully believe that some of you may be missing the point with respect to any potential FTC oversight downstream which sorta dovetails what Wayne said and echoes Craig&#039;s&#039;s excellent thoughts. 
 
 
 
1) Affiliates mean those involved in any of the following and or a combo: CPA/CPL, CPC/PPC, Email, and last but far from least CPM (which is really CPA! in a significant number of Campaigns) For better or worse :) It&#039;s all of these from a regulatory standpoint and although YOU may not work in CPM (for example) it seems to me that you should pay VERY carefull attention to any regulatory action and or pending issues. NO ONE and or NO type of site is immune downstream. 
 
 
 
2) Bolded by me and directly from the FTC: 
 
 
 
 
 
&quot;Although the number of companies advertising online-and the number of consumers 
 
shopping online-are soaring, fraud and deception may dampen consumer confidence in the e-marketplace. But cyberspace is not without boundaries, and fraud and deception are unlawful no matter what the medium. &lt;b&gt;The FTC has enforced and will continue enforcing its consumer protection laws online to ensure that products and services are described truthfully in online ads and that consumers get what they pay for.&lt;/b&gt; These activities benefit consumers as well as sellers, who expect and deserve a fair marketplace. 
 
 
 
From the following page which also contains tons of juicy thoughts that have the potential to effect every single person involved in the Affiliate/Merchant/Network space: 
 
 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/dotcom/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/dotco...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
 
 
:) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the sky is not falling and the Affiliate channell and everyone else involved will continue to work. However, I respectfully believe that some of you may be missing the point with respect to any potential FTC oversight downstream which sorta dovetails what Wayne said and echoes Craig&#039;s&#039;s excellent thoughts. </p>
<p>1) Affiliates mean those involved in any of the following and or a combo: CPA/CPL, CPC/PPC, Email, and last but far from least CPM (which is really CPA! in a significant number of Campaigns) For better or worse <img src='http://www.revenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#039;s all of these from a regulatory standpoint and although YOU may not work in CPM (for example) it seems to me that you should pay VERY carefull attention to any regulatory action and or pending issues. NO ONE and or NO type of site is immune downstream. </p>
<p>2) Bolded by me and directly from the FTC: </p>
<p>&quot;Although the number of companies advertising online-and the number of consumers </p>
<p>shopping online-are soaring, fraud and deception may dampen consumer confidence in the e-marketplace. But cyberspace is not without boundaries, and fraud and deception are unlawful no matter what the medium. <b>The FTC has enforced and will continue enforcing its consumer protection laws online to ensure that products and services are described truthfully in online ads and that consumers get what they pay for.</b> These activities benefit consumers as well as sellers, who expect and deserve a fair marketplace. </p>
<p>From the following page which also contains tons of juicy thoughts that have the potential to effect every single person involved in the Affiliate/Merchant/Network space: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/dotcom/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/dotco&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>  <img src='http://www.revenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Shubitz</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Shubitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=255#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>Of course the sky is not falling and the Affiliate channell and everyone else involved will continue to work. However, I respectfully believe that some of you may be missing the point with respect to any potential FTC oversight downstream which sorta dovetails what Wayne said and echoes Craig&#039;s&#039;s excellent thoughts. 
 
1) Affiliates mean those involved in any of the following and or a combo: CPA/CPL, CPC/PPC, Email, and last but far from least CPM (which is really CPA! in a significant number of Campaigns) For better or worse :) It&#039;s all of these from a regulatory standpoint and although YOU may not work in CPM (for example) it seems to me that you should pay VERY carefull attention to any regulatory action and or pending issues. NO ONE and or NO type of site is immune downstream. 
 
2) Bolded by me and directly from the FTC: 
 
 
&quot;Although the number of companies advertising online-and the number of consumers 
shopping online-are soaring, fraud and deception may dampen consumer confidence in the e-marketplace. But cyberspace is not without boundaries, and fraud and deception are unlawful no matter what the medium. &lt;b&gt;The FTC has enforced and will continue enforcing its consumer protection laws online to ensure that products and services are described truthfully in online ads and that consumers get what they pay for.&lt;/b&gt; These activities benefit consumers as well as sellers, who expect and deserve a fair marketplace. 
 
From the following page which also contains tons of juicy thoughts that have the potential to effect every single person involved in the Affiliate/Merchant/Network space: 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/dotcom/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/dotco...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
:) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the sky is not falling and the Affiliate channell and everyone else involved will continue to work. However, I respectfully believe that some of you may be missing the point with respect to any potential FTC oversight downstream which sorta dovetails what Wayne said and echoes Craig&#039;s&#039;s excellent thoughts. </p>
<p>1) Affiliates mean those involved in any of the following and or a combo: CPA/CPL, CPC/PPC, Email, and last but far from least CPM (which is really CPA! in a significant number of Campaigns) For better or worse <img src='http://www.revenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#039;s all of these from a regulatory standpoint and although YOU may not work in CPM (for example) it seems to me that you should pay VERY carefull attention to any regulatory action and or pending issues. NO ONE and or NO type of site is immune downstream. </p>
<p>2) Bolded by me and directly from the FTC: </p>
<p>&quot;Although the number of companies advertising online-and the number of consumers<br />
shopping online-are soaring, fraud and deception may dampen consumer confidence in the e-marketplace. But cyberspace is not without boundaries, and fraud and deception are unlawful no matter what the medium. <b>The FTC has enforced and will continue enforcing its consumer protection laws online to ensure that products and services are described truthfully in online ads and that consumers get what they pay for.</b> These activities benefit consumers as well as sellers, who expect and deserve a fair marketplace. </p>
<p>From the following page which also contains tons of juicy thoughts that have the potential to effect every single person involved in the Affiliate/Merchant/Network space: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/dotcom/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/dotco&#8230;</a><br />
  <img src='http://www.revenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=255#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>sorry- &quot;answer&quot; my questions. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry- &quot;answer&quot; my questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=255#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>you didn&#039;t ask my questions...maybe frodo will... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you didn&#039;t ask my questions&#8230;maybe frodo will&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Kirsch</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Kirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=255#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>Wayne, 
 
I&#039;m not talking about my business model or numbers in public and I would not expect anyone else to either. 
 
What is public is we are five bar CJ publisher. I&#039;ll leave it at that. 
 
Beth </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne, </p>
<p>I&#039;m not talking about my business model or numbers in public and I would not expect anyone else to either. </p>
<p>What is public is we are five bar CJ publisher. I&#039;ll leave it at that. </p>
<p>Beth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=255#comment-1384</guid>
		<description>Never challenged that at all Beth, I know your experience- I challenged your POV. 
 
If you work as an affiliate now- then tell us about it. Illuminate. If you can&#039;t give numbers- then illuminate in some other fashion. 
 
How do you like the deal structures? 
 
Do they seem fair? 
 
-wayne </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never challenged that at all Beth, I know your experience- I challenged your POV. </p>
<p>If you work as an affiliate now- then tell us about it. Illuminate. If you can&#039;t give numbers- then illuminate in some other fashion. </p>
<p>How do you like the deal structures? </p>
<p>Do they seem fair? </p>
<p>-wayne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Kirsch</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Kirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=255#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>Well, actually Wayne I work for an affiliate now in case you missed that. 
 
But I wrote this as an expert in the field.  Feel free to challenge that. 
 
Beth </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, actually Wayne I work for an affiliate now in case you missed that. </p>
<p>But I wrote this as an expert in the field.  Feel free to challenge that. </p>
<p>Beth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=255#comment-1382</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is there some kind of litmus test to determine who gets to opine about affiliate marketing now?&quot; 
 
No Shawn. I was merely laughing. I know it is unusual, but it happens at times. Then again I don&#039;t opine about things outside of my sphere of experience, e.g. lumberjack politics. 
 
If Beth has acquired that POV- then by all means opine away! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Is there some kind of litmus test to determine who gets to opine about affiliate marketing now?&quot; </p>
<p>No Shawn. I was merely laughing. I know it is unusual, but it happens at times. Then again I don&#039;t opine about things outside of my sphere of experience, e.g. lumberjack politics. </p>
<p>If Beth has acquired that POV- then by all means opine away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth Kirsch</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator>beth Kirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=255#comment-1381</guid>
		<description>Brian, 
 
I did not see you post either until I found out Jim used mine on it.  What I wrote was not towards you or your point at all which is more than fair and accurate. 
 
That said, what I don&#039;t understand about this whole thing is the big affiliates these days are 
 
-- Incentive sites 
-- Search sites 
-- loyalty sites 
-- coupon sites 
 
For the most part, most of these will not be impacted by the FTC and so, most affiliates wont be touched by this. 
 
Beth </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, </p>
<p>I did not see you post either until I found out Jim used mine on it.  What I wrote was not towards you or your point at all which is more than fair and accurate. </p>
<p>That said, what I don&#039;t understand about this whole thing is the big affiliates these days are </p>
<p>&#8211; Incentive sites<br />
&#8211; Search sites<br />
&#8211; loyalty sites<br />
&#8211; coupon sites </p>
<p>For the most part, most of these will not be impacted by the FTC and so, most affiliates wont be touched by this. </p>
<p>Beth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/affiliate-marketing/the-ftc-affiliate-marketing-and-chicken-little/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revenews.contentrobot.com/?p=255#comment-1380</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, 
 
Why dont you quote the full post in context, instead of taking the part that suits you. 
 
Thanks, 
Wayne </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, </p>
<p>Why dont you quote the full post in context, instead of taking the part that suits you. </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Wayne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.revenews.com @ 2012-02-09 15:07:13 -->
