<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Reporters and Bloggers Guilty Of Using Weapons of Statistical Destruction?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/andrewwee/are-reporters-and-bloggers-guilty-of-using-weapons-of-statistical-destruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/case-studies/are-reporters-and-bloggers-guilty-of-using-weapons-of-statistical-destruction/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Marketing, SEM, Social Media, Mobile and Video, Micro-Content, and Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molander</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/case-studies/are-reporters-and-bloggers-guilty-of-using-weapons-of-statistical-destruction/#comment-22879</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/?p=4420#comment-22879</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another example fresh off the press: 
 
&quot;Tim Searchinger of Princeton University uncovered a potentially damaging flaw in the way carbon emissions from bioenergy are calculated under the Kyoto Protocol and in the carbon cap-and-trade bill currently being debated in Congress. If that error in calculation goes unfixed, a future increase in biofuel use could end up backfiring and derailing efforts to control global warming, according to the paper....&quot; 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://budurl.com/4kvf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://budurl.com/4kvf&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s another example fresh off the press:</p>
<p>&quot;Tim Searchinger of Princeton University uncovered a potentially damaging flaw in the way carbon emissions from bioenergy are calculated under the Kyoto Protocol and in the carbon cap-and-trade bill currently being debated in Congress. If that error in calculation goes unfixed, a future increase in biofuel use could end up backfiring and derailing efforts to control global warming, according to the paper&#8230;.&quot;</p>
<p>  <a href="http://budurl.com/4kvf" rel="nofollow">http://budurl.com/4kvf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molander</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/case-studies/are-reporters-and-bloggers-guilty-of-using-weapons-of-statistical-destruction/#comment-22878</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/?p=4420#comment-22878</guid>
		<description>Andrew... 
I&#039;m pretty excited to be reading this.  Here&#039;s why: 
 
1) You care. Your passion about this is palpable. 
2) You&#039;re right.  Your math works! 
3) You&#039;re naming names. 
4) Your expectations are vital to industry growth. 
5) I&#039;m starting a new blog that will feature nothing but &quot;truthbusting&quot; -- on a regular basis, I&#039;ll be taking on what I call faux research or &quot;research.&quot;  I will be ranking research based on a handful of factors and giving it a 1-10 rank.  Things like transparency, accountability, methodology, etc. 
 
Want to be a collaborator in some way?  Shoot me an email if so and we can talk. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#039;m pretty excited to be reading this.  Here&#039;s why:</p>
<p>1) You care. Your passion about this is palpable.</p>
<p>2) You&#039;re right.  Your math works!</p>
<p>3) You&#039;re naming names.</p>
<p>4) Your expectations are vital to industry growth.</p>
<p>5) I&#039;m starting a new blog that will feature nothing but &quot;truthbusting&quot; &#8212; on a regular basis, I&#039;ll be taking on what I call faux research or &quot;research.&quot;  I will be ranking research based on a handful of factors and giving it a 1-10 rank.  Things like transparency, accountability, methodology, etc.</p>
<p>Want to be a collaborator in some way?  Shoot me an email if so and we can talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.revenews.com @ 2012-02-09 20:11:48 -->
