<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Reporters and Bloggers Guilty Of Using Weapons of Statistical Destruction?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revenews.com/andrewwee/are-reporters-and-bloggers-guilty-of-using-weapons-of-statistical-destruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revenews.com/andrewwee/are-reporters-and-bloggers-guilty-of-using-weapons-of-statistical-destruction/</link>
	<description>Discussion of Online Advertising, CPA, SEO, Affiliate and Next Generation Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:53:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molander</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/andrewwee/are-reporters-and-bloggers-guilty-of-using-weapons-of-statistical-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-22879</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/?p=4420#comment-22879</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another example fresh off the press:

&quot;Tim Searchinger of Princeton University uncovered a potentially damaging flaw in the way carbon emissions from bioenergy are calculated under the Kyoto Protocol and in the carbon cap-and-trade bill currently being debated in Congress. If that error in calculation goes unfixed, a future increase in biofuel use could end up backfiring and derailing efforts to control global warming, according to the paper....&quot;

http://budurl.com/4kvf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another example fresh off the press:</p>
<p>&#8220;Tim Searchinger of Princeton University uncovered a potentially damaging flaw in the way carbon emissions from bioenergy are calculated under the Kyoto Protocol and in the carbon cap-and-trade bill currently being debated in Congress. If that error in calculation goes unfixed, a future increase in biofuel use could end up backfiring and derailing efforts to control global warming, according to the paper&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://budurl.com/4kvf" rel="nofollow">http://budurl.com/4kvf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molander</title>
		<link>http://www.revenews.com/andrewwee/are-reporters-and-bloggers-guilty-of-using-weapons-of-statistical-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-22878</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revenews.com/?p=4420#comment-22878</guid>
		<description>Andrew...
I&#039;m pretty excited to be reading this.  Here&#039;s why:

1) You care. Your passion about this is palpable.
2) You&#039;re right.  Your math works!
3) You&#039;re naming names.
4) Your expectations are vital to industry growth.
5) I&#039;m starting a new blog that will feature nothing but &quot;truthbusting&quot; -- on a regular basis, I&#039;ll be taking on what I call faux research or &quot;research.&quot;  I will be ranking research based on a handful of factors and giving it a 1-10 rank.  Things like transparency, accountability, methodology, etc.

Want to be a collaborator in some way?  Shoot me an email if so and we can talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;m pretty excited to be reading this.  Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>1) You care. Your passion about this is palpable.<br />
2) You&#8217;re right.  Your math works!<br />
3) You&#8217;re naming names.<br />
4) Your expectations are vital to industry growth.<br />
5) I&#8217;m starting a new blog that will feature nothing but &#8220;truthbusting&#8221; &#8212; on a regular basis, I&#8217;ll be taking on what I call faux research or &#8220;research.&#8221;  I will be ranking research based on a handful of factors and giving it a 1-10 rank.  Things like transparency, accountability, methodology, etc.</p>
<p>Want to be a collaborator in some way?  Shoot me an email if so and we can talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
